Maintaining clean, consistent, high-quality manufacturing instructions is critical for effective operator training and repeatable execution. But maintaining that standard is typically a manual endeavor, undertaken ad-hoc by process owners or continuous improvement managers, a dedicated technical writer, or frequently not at all due to the overhead involved. The result is days-long feedback loops, and instruction sets that drift in quality over time, with costly issues that surface on the floor and disrupt production.

Process CI brings a different approach, borrowed from software development and adapted for manufacturing, shortening the feedback flow to minutes and driving consistent, continuously improving documentation to the point of use.

#What “CI” Means in Threaded

In software, CI stands for Continuous Integration: a practice where automated checks run against every proposed change to a codebase before it’s deployed. Issues are caught early, in review, before they can cause problems in production.

In manufacturing, CI traditionally stands for Continuous Improvement: the ongoing effort to refine and optimize how a product is built.

Process CI in Threaded is both. It’s an automated review system that runs checks against your instruction set every time a Change Request is opened, catching quality and completeness issues before they reach the floor, all while building in iterative improvements over time. You get the rigor of a technical writer and the discipline of automated testing, without needing additional staff.

#What Process CI Checks

Process CI currently runs checks across two categories:

Completeness Ensures that procedures have all required components including steps, images, tooling, cycle times, and that each Change Request includes an adequate description of what changed and why, to drive clarity for the team and to satisfy documentation requirements for compliance frameworks like ISO 9001.

Quality Reviews instructions against industry standards like STE-100 for technical writing and visual documentation. These checks confirm that language is clear and appropriate for operator training and technical documentation, and that images and image annotations are relevant, of sufficient quality, and beneficial to the operator.

These categories will expand over time as Threaded adds new checks to help manufacturing teams scale their processes.

#How It Works

#Triggered During a Change Request

Process CI checks can run against the scope of any Change Request when a CR is opened for review. Any Editor can trigger the checks to run by clicking the “Run all” button under the Reviews section at the bottom of the conversation tab in the CR. Additionally, individual checks can be run by clicking on the 3-dot menu for a given check and selecting “Run Check”.

#Reviewing the Results

Results are surfaced inline during the CR review, showing exactly which procedures or instructions have issues and what needs to be addressed. Checks can be selected and configured as required before publishing or left as optional in the Configuration pane of Version Control, depending on the needs of your organization.

#AI-Supported Fixes

Where an automatic fix is available (such as a technical writing issue) Threaded’s AI can propose and apply a correction directly. Clicking “Fix with AI” will open a new AI chat to guide the user through a fix. The AI will navigate to the issue, suggest a fix with a Current/Updated comparison of the proposed change. The editor reviews it and chooses whether to accept the fix or handle it manually. The editor remains in control throughout, and AI will act to change the instruction set on approval only.

#Running Checks Outside of a CR

CI checks can also be run independently at any time through the Chat window by requesting a check directly. This is useful for auditing existing instructions or reviewing the quality of a draft before opening a CR.

#The Process CI History

Every formal CI run is logged under the Process CI tab, giving your team a record of when checks were last run and what was flagged. Over time this becomes a quality history for your instruction set. It shows not just what changed, but how the standard of your documentation has improved alongside it.

#Why This Matters

Most quality issues in manufacturing documentation aren’t caught until they cause a problem on the floor — a missed step, an unclear image, an incomplete procedure. By the time an operator flags it, the instruction has already been in Production and is causing confusion, defects, or line-down situations.

Process CI moves that feedback loop earlier in the process where issues are much less expensive to find — in review, before they’re published, by automated checks that run every time a change is proposed. Combined with AI-supported fixes, it means your team can iterate quickly without letting documentation quality slip, and without needing a dedicated technical writer to keep pace.

Process CI